UNILEVER Australia is a leading supplier of fast-moving consumer goods providing foods and home and personal care brands in Australia and New Zealand. Examples include Continental, Dove, Lipton, Lynx, Omo/Persil, Rexona, Streets and Sunsilk. Their long term success requires a total commitment to exceptional standards of performance by combining economic growth with sound environmental management.
With this in mind, the North Rocks site in Sydney decided to improve the performance of its Health & Beauty Mixing plant and Aerosols plant through updating their process control systems.
The North Rocks site is responsible for the manufacture of personal health and beauty products, aerosols, liquid detergents and cleaning products.
With the market for fast moving consumer goods being more competitive and cost sensitive than ever, maintaining optimal productivity and availability is critical to the future of every site.
“Manufacturing pressures on sourcing continue to increase,” said Matthew Leys, project engineer at North Rocks. “There is a significant need to improve the efficiency of the plant while at the same time reducing costs. This is critical when looking to secure the long term viability of the plant.”
Downtime, quality issues & bottlenecks
SUCH pressures led Unilever to review the control strategy for North Rocks in 2002. Led at the time by Fiona Fong, Unilever identified a number of areas for improvement.
Of particular concern was the Health & Beauty Mixing plant, which suffered from downtime and variation in some product quality. The plant had also been identified as a bottleneck, which was restricting the overall throughput of the plant.
The review also revealed a need for standardisation across the site to ensure existing and future operations personnel were fully conversant with the automation and operations environment. However, despite such compelling needs for change, there was a limited budget available.
Protecting investment & standardisation
IN the early 1990s, Unilever installed Texas Instruments 505 controllers with Fix HMI and batching system. Towards the end of the decade, the reliability of this mix, combined with changes in the product range, led to production problems caused in part by its non-integrated nature and the need for manual intervention in the process.
Such factors led to the decision to change their control strategy. Having evaluated several control solutions, Unilever decided to proceed with the Siemens Simatic PCS7 process control system while utilising the existing TI-505 I/O.
“System I/O counts for a large proportion of the capital outlay on a control system, with its life expectancy often exceeding that of the controller and HMI components,” said Daraius Battiwalla of Siemens. “With TI being part of Siemens, it was relatively straight forward to integrate this I/O with PCS7, thus ensuring Unilever benefited from maximum return on their original investment.”
Faced with a limited budget, Unilever decided to develop the application code in-house, with support from Siemens. This made sense for Unilever, which was looking not only to control the costs of the project but also wished to develop its own in-house expertise. It also ensured that the company could confidently look beyond the Health & Beauty Mixing project, and take a site wide view for upgrades and standardisation centred on PCS7.
Unilever also made the decision to use the ISA S88 compliant PCS7 batch engine, Simatic Batch, in order to improve product consistency and reduce cycle times. As a relatively new product, Simatic Batch and the need for S88 compliance presented another set of challenges for the Unilever engineers.
However, with the aid of Siemens engineers, the intuitive design of the product and its tight integration with PCS7, initial concerns proved unfounded.
The batching system proved central to obtaining process improvements and ensuring compliance with TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) requirements. Unilever was, however, looking well beyond current requirements and ensuring that it implemented a solution that could handle future legislative change. For this, the company found the flexibility, traceability and reporting power that PCS7 and Simatic Batch provided ideally suited to handle change.
Confidence
SUCCESSFULLY delivered within a 12-month time-frame, Unilever moved on to the next phase of its plan: upgrading the Aerosols plant. Although the system was smaller than that of the Health & Beauty plant, it was however presented with the challenge of only having a third of the timeframe for completion.
Again the decision was made by Unilever to deliver the project through its in-house engineering team. With significant expertise having been developed while undertaking the Health & Beauty project, confidence was high despite the challenging timescales.
With standards that had been developed during the first project, the team set to working on the Aerosols project buoyed by the knowledge that “the process of design is fairly intuitive with PCS7”, according to Leys.
Significant returns
AGAIN delivered on time and within budget, Unilever is satisfied that it is now reaping the rewards of integrated process control and batch architectures. Not only does Unilever now have a common operator environment across the two plants, with the benefit of reduced training costs, the company has also seen a significant reduction in the time it takes to identify and resolve process problems.
Reporting and the provision of live plant data to ERP systems has also been simplified, thus providing a higher degree of accurate process data for planning purposes.
More telling, however, is the hard evidence uncovered on examining the significant returns on investment in the short time since implementation.
Quality of the product has improved with the RFT (Right First Time) figures showing an increase in excess of 15 percent, plus a rise in OME (Overall Mixing Efficiency). Batch cycle times for shampoo have also been reduced, showing an improvement of 13 percent over the previous system, not only demonstrating greater efficiency but also providing Unilever with the opportunity to increase overall productivity.
Probably the most telling result from the move to PCS7 has been the dramatic improvement in plant availability.
Unilever monitors all aspects of the processes rigorously to identify potential problems. Monitoring computer and control system downtime has provided an accurate assessment of the improvements since PCS7 was installed, which show a reduction in downtime approaching 90 percent.
Such returns have not only justified Unilever’s original decision to use PCS7 and Simatic Batch, but have also given the confidence to expand the system into other areas for future.
“Due to the reliability and flexibility of PCS7and Simatic Batch, we have decided that the most sensible way forward is to incorporate additional process equipment into the system,” said Leys. This approach goes a long way to meeting the “commitment to exceptional standards of performance” expected by this forward-thinking organisation.